物理信息神经网络求解亥姆霍兹方程的配置点采样方法

A collocation point sampling method for solving the Helmholtz equation using physics-informed neural networks

  • 摘要:
    背景 地震波场模拟中,物理信息神经网络(physics-informed neural networks, PINNs)凭借其无网格求解特性为亥姆霍兹方程(Helmholtz equation)高效计算开辟了新途径。然而,在复杂介质模型的亥姆霍兹方程正演中,传统的均匀网格配置点采样策略无法高效地提供梯度信息,导致其训练时间长、资源消耗大。
    目的和方法 为了提升PINNs的正演效率和精度,并解决动态采样的配置点在震源处异常聚集这一问题,提出了基于残差分布的混合配置点重采样策略(hybrid residual-based adaptive distribution, RAD-H),并与6种固定采样策略和4种动态采样策略进行对比分析。该策略在震源区域采用固定采样确保震源特征捕捉,在其他区域则实施基于残差分布的自适应重采样(residual-based adaptive distribution, RAD),保证重采样配置点与目标高残差区域空间采样的一致性。
    结果 经数值实验表明:在均匀介质模型中,RAD-H策略相较于经典基准方法仅需使用18.57%的配置点数量,却能够使波场L2误差降低3.050%,同时该策略训练耗时约为4 192.5 s,计算效率较经典基准方法提升了231.74%;在Marmousi2模型中,RAD-H策略控制与经典基准方法相同量级误差,使用的配置点数量减少57.75%。
    结论 该策略解决了其他动态采样策略在震源区域采样过密、其他区域采样不足的问题,显著提升了PINNs在含震源正演中的配置点采样效率,对高效高精度模拟复杂地质模型波场具有启发意义。

     

    Abstract:
    Background In the field of seismic wavefield simulation, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a new method for efficiently solving the Helmholtz equation due to their characteristic of grid-free computation. However, for the forward modeling of complex medium models using the Helmholtz equation, traditional uniform grid-based methods for collocation point sampling are insufficient to efficiently provide gradient information, leading to prolonged training time and high resource consumption.
    Objective and Method  To improve the forward modeling efficiency and accuracy based on PINNs and overcome the anomalous concentration of collocation points in the seismic source during dynamic sampling, this study proposed a hybrid residual-based adaptive distribution (RAD-H) method and then compared this method with six fixed and four dynamic sampling methods. In the RAD-H method, fixed sampling is employed for the seismic source area to ensure the capture of the source features, and residual-based adaptive distribution (RAD) is used for other areas to ensure the consistency between the resampled collocation points and the spatial sampling of the high-residual target area.
    Results Numerical experiments indicate that for a homogeneous medium model, the RAD-H method reduced the L2 error of the wavefield by 3.050% using only 18.57% of collocation points compared to the classical baseline method. Moreover, the RAD-H method exhibited a model training time of approximately 4192.5 s, suggesting an improvement of 231.74% in computational efficiency compared to the classical baseline method. For the Marmousi2 model, the RAD-H strategy remained the error within the same order of magnitude as the classical baseline method while reducing the number of collocation points by 57.75%.
    Conclusions The RAD-H method overcomes oversampling for seismic source areas and undersampling for other areas of other dynamic sampling methods, significantly enhancing the sampling efficiency of collocation points of PINNs during the forward modeling involving seismic sources. This study holds significant implications for efficient, high-precision wavefield simulation of complex geological models.

     

/

返回文章
返回