二氧化碳封存技术命名和分类

Designation and classification of CO2 storage technologies

  • 摘要:
    目的和方法 面对二氧化碳封存技术跨多个学科、涉及范围模糊,目前,没有规范认定标准、命名和分类标准,针对这一问题,提出二氧化碳封存技术认定标准和命名原则,分析地质、地下空间、海洋水体和利用封存等4类常见封存技术,在此基础上确定二氧化碳封存技术分类思路和方案。
    结果和结论 (1) 二氧化碳封存技术认定标准:须将CO2与大气有效隔离,隔离时间须是长期的甚至是永久的;须是人为减少大气中CO2的活动,在大气CO2标准化基线以外并超出该基线的活动;对减少大气中的CO2是正向的。(2) 中英文(含英文简称)命名原则:业界熟知的技术名称直接引用,与熟知技术名称类似地套用其命名规则;新兴技术使用学术搜索引擎,采用频次高的中英文名称;英文中sequestration和storage在碳封存领域略有区别,sequestration注重科学机理、storage尺度广或偏向工程技术。(3) 分类思路:采取分级分类的整体思路,首先按碳封存所处海陆环境的差异性,分为陆地和海洋2大类;其次根据CO2封存空间和机理要素继续划分出若干类型;再次以封存深度和规模为标准,进一步分类;最后以封存比例和时间的不同为依据,划分出最小的类型。(4) 分类方案:分2个层次,建立“二层七级”二氧化碳封存技术分类体系。第一层次为“环−空−机”,对应封存环境−封存空间−封存机理,为3个定性指标,第二层次为“亚类−型−级−模式”,对应封存深度−封存规模−封存比例−封存时间,为4个定量化指标。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective and Method Currently, there remains a lack of criteria for technical certification, designation, and classification of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage technologies due to their cross-disciplinary nature and ambiguous scopes. To address this issue, this study proposes technical certification criteria and designation principles, as well as analyzes four types of common CO2 storage technologies: geologic storage, underground space storage, ocean water storage, and utilization and storage. Accordingly, a classification philosophy and scheme for these technologies is determined.
    Results and Conclusions In terms for technical certification criteria, a CO2 storage technology has to meet four criteria: (1) it must enable effective, long-term to permanent separation of CO2 from the atmosphere; (2) it must be anthropogenic activity aimed at reducing atmospheric CO2 beyond statutory requirements; (3) it should do no significant harm to the environment. Regarding the designation in Chinese and English (including English abbreviations) for CO2 storage technologies, the following principles should be followed: (1) well-known technology names should be used without modification, while technologies similar to those widely recognized should be designated following the designation principles of the latter. For emerging technologies, the most frequently used Chinese and English names, as identified using academic search engines, shall be used. For English terms, "sequestration" and "storage" differ slightly in the field of carbon removal. Specifically, "sequestration" emphasizes scientific mechanisms, while "storage" highlights a broader scale or is more engineering-oriented. A generally hierarchical classification philosophy is proposed in this study. First, based on their differences in storage environments, CO2 storage technologies can be divided into terrestrial and marine categories. Second, several types can be determined based on CO2 storage space and mechanism. Third, further classification is performed by storage depth and scale. Fourth, the minimum types can be determined by further classification by storage proportion and time. Using this classification philosophy, a classification scheme for CO2 storage technologies is determined, consisting of two levels and seven indicators. The first level comprises storage environment, storage space, and storage mechanism, which are three qualitative indicators. The second level is composed of sub-class, model, grade, and pattern, corresponding to four quantitative indicators, i.e., storage depth, storage scale, storage proportion, and storage time, respectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回