煤层底板突水灾害动水治理技术及堵水效果研究

Technologies for controlling water inrushes from coal seam floors under flowing water and their water plugging performance

  • 摘要:
    目的 煤层底板灰岩水害是我国两类主要矿山水害之一,由于灰岩含水层静储量丰富且动态补给量较大,为了降低突水造成的经济损失和人员伤亡,灾后抢险救援注浆堵水常在动水条件下开展。
    方法 根据我国大量动水治理案例和动水治理方案设计基本要求,系统梳理了现有动水治理技术及其优缺点,厘定了动水治理条件类型,总结了现有动水治理模式,阐明动水治理堵水效果评价共性指标,并进行了典型案例分析,最后指出动水治理存在的共性问题及发展方向。
    结果和结论 (1)动水治理技术包括过水巷道截流建造阻水墙降低充水强度、突水通道截流建造止水塞封堵充水通道、突水含水层堵源建造止水帷幕切断充水水源3种,其中前2种可再分为3类和2类。(2)过水巷道截流堵水时间最短,但不能根治突水区域再次发生突水可能,其中第二类仅适用于突水压力低、流量小且围岩力学强度高的堵水环境;突水通道截流通常需要和过水巷道截流相结合,堵水效果最佳;突水含水层堵源堵水时间最长,但安全系数最高,通常需要和突水通道截流相结合,堵水效果最佳。(3)动水治理条件根据突水后井下排水泵房是否被淹,分为尚未淹没矿井和尚未完全淹没矿井2类,其中尚未完全淹没矿井较为常见,且当淹没水位在突水点高程之下时堵水难度最大;根据突水点位置及突水通道是否已经查明和突水点周边井巷空间位置关系是否能够确定,分为直接封堵、先探查后治理和探治结合以探为主3类。(4)动水治理模式包括3类单一技术堵水和2类2种堵水技术相结合共5类,其中巷道掘进突水主要采用过水巷道截流、突水通道截流及两者相结合堵水模式,工作面回采突水主要采用突水含水层堵源、突水通道截流及两者相结合堵水模式。(5)动水治理属于典型的后注浆工程,具有即时响应性注浆属性,堵水效果评价以实测的突水量变化和突水含水层水位变化为主,以钻探注浆特征分析和物探监测为辅,各类堵水效果评价方法共性显现指标为最终注浆建造阻水体的力学强度和渗透性能;选取常用的第一类和第三类巷道截流动水治理技术为例,建立动水治理流固耦合数学模型进行数值模拟,结果表明第三类过水巷道截流阻水墙骨架具有高阻弱渗的阻水性能。(6)动水治理存在的共性问题是浆液很难快速在堵水目标空间中停留、积存和固结,导致堵水工程不但工程量大且工期长,下一步发展方向包括深入开展动水注浆理论研究,建立动水治理工学,形成动水注浆工程控制标准;构建矿井充水因素透明地质系统;研发扩散范围及流动方向可控、黏结力学强度高、韧性好、不透水、可注性好、价格低、来源广的注浆材料和高效可控智能化注浆设备及工艺。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Limestone water hazards in coal seam floors represent one of the two primary categories of mine water hazards in China. Limestone aquifers are generally characterized by abundant static water reserves and considerable dynamic water recharge. To reduce economic losses and casualties caused by water inrushes from limestone aquifers, post-disaster emergency rescue through grouting for water plugging is frequently carried out under flowing water.
    Methods Based on numerous cases of water inrush control under flowing water in China and the fundamental requirements for control scheme design, this study presents a systematic review of existing technologies for water inrush control under flowing water, along with their advantages and limitations. Furthermore, this study categorizes the conditions for water inrush control under flowing water, summarizes existing control modes, and elucidates the common indicators for evaluating the water plugging performance of various control technologies. Following an analysis of typical cases, this study proposes the common challenges and future development directions for water inrush control under flowing water.
    Results and Conclusions The results indicate that technologies for water inrush control under flowing water can be classified into three types: (1) cutting off water in water-flowing roadways by constructing water blocking walls to reduce water filling intensity, (2) cutting off water in water inrush pathways by constructing water-stop plugs to block water filling pathways, and (3) blocking water sources in the aquifers subjected to water inrushes by constructing grouting curtain to block water sources, with the first and second categories can be further divided into three and two types, respectively. Among the three major technology categories, cutting off water in water-flowing roadways exhibits the shortest operation duration. However, this technology fails to eliminate the possibility of water inrush recurrence in the original area suffering from water inrushes. The second type of this technology is only applicable to water plugging in environments with low water inrush pressure, low flow rates, and high mechanical strength of surrounding rocks. Generally, cutting off water in water inrush pathways can deliver the optimal water plugging performance when combining cutting off water in water-flowing roadways. Despite the longest operation duration, blocking water sources in the aquifers subjected to water inrushes exhibits the highest safety factor. This technology typically offers the optimal water plugging performance when combining cutting off water in water inrush pathways. Based on the submergence conditions of the underground drainage pump room following water inrushes, the conditions for water inrush control under flowing water can be classified into two types: unsubmerged mines and incompletely submerged mines, with the latter type commonly observed. Notably, water plugging operations are the most challenging when the submergence water level falls below the elevation of the water inrush point. Based on whether water inrush points and pathways are identified and whether the spatial relationships between mine roadways around water inrush points are determined, water inrush control under flowing water can be classified into three types: direct water plugging, post-detection water inrush control, and detection-control combination with a focus on detection. The modes of water inrush control under flowing water consist of three water plugging modes based on a single technology and two water plugging modes based on the combination of two technologies. For water inrushes occurring during roadway tunnelling, the recommended control modes include the technology of cutting off water in water-flowing roadways, the technology of cutting off water in water inrush pathways, and the combination of both. For water inrushes occurring during coal mining, primary control modes encompass the technology of blocking water sources in the aquifers subjected to water inrushes, the technology of cutting off water in water inrush pathways, and the combination of both. Water inrush control under flowing water represents typical post-disaster grouting engineering characterized by instantaneous grouting responses. The water plugging performance is primarily evaluated based on measured variations in both water inrush volume and the water level of aquifers subjected to water inrushes, supplemented by borehole grouting characterization and geophysical monitoring. Common indicators for various evaluation methods include the mechanical strength and permeability of the final grouted water-blocking bodies. Focusing on the commonly used first and third types of the technology of cutting off water in water-flowing roadways, a fluid-solid coupling mathematical model is established for numerical simulations of water inrush control under flowing water. The simulation results indicate that the skeletons of water blocking walls constructed for the third type exhibit high water resistance and low permeability. A common challenge in water inrush control under flowing water is that the cement grout for grouting struggles to rapidly settle, accumulate, and consolidate within the target area of water plugging. This issue leads to substantial engineering workload and prolonged grouting duration. Future development directions include (1) deepening the theoretical research on grouting under flowing water, establishing engineering disciplines for water inrush control under flowing water, and developing control standards for grouting engineering under flowing water; (2) constructing transparent geological systems for factors controlling water filling in mines; and (3) the research and development (R&D) of grouting materials with controllable diffusion ranges and flow directions, high bond strength, excellent toughness, encouraging impermeability, excellent injectivity, low costs, and wide sources, as well as the R&D of efficient, controllable, and intelligent grouting equipment and processes.

     

/

返回文章
返回