碎软煤层顶板水平井体积压裂参数优化与实践

Parameter optimization and field application of roof volume fracturing using horizontal wells for coalbed methane extraction from broken-soft coal seams

  • 摘要:
    目的和方法 为实现碎软煤层地面水平井快速抽采,提出了煤层顶板水平井体积压裂技术。以某矿区4-1煤为研究对象,通过Abaqus有限元软件建立数值模型,探究地应力条件对多裂缝穿层延展特性的影响;通过真三轴水力压裂实验分析不同排量、簇数、簇间距下多裂缝扩展规律;运用Mshale三维压裂设计软件,对体积压裂中射孔簇数与簇间距、排量、平均砂比及压裂液规模等关键参数开展优化研究,并进行工程实践。
    结果和结论 (1) 地应力状态决定体积压裂缝网形态,当垂向应力差异系数k≤0时,多裂缝易沿最小水平主应力方向形成水平缝,k≥0.25时,多裂缝快速穿层形成垂直缝,穿层速度随k增大而提升;层间应力差增大使多裂缝在煤层中长度增加、顶板中长度减少,且中间裂缝与两侧裂缝的长度差值及平均起裂压力随应力差增大而增大。(2) 试样中裂缝起裂后优先在顶板中扩展,低排量下煤层内缝高不足,中排量可促进裂缝在煤层中扩展并形成贯通缝网,高排量虽能使裂缝延伸至试样边界但会升高起裂压力;2簇时形成“ | ”形缝,储层改造不均,3簇时裂缝可在煤层连通,形成“∨”形缝网,4簇时会引发强烈缝间干扰,在顶板中形成“凵”形缝网,水平缝阻碍垂直缝穿层;簇间距过大时近井口射孔簇优先起裂成为优势通道,其余射孔簇难以起裂,不利于缝网形成。(3) 射孔簇数过多、簇间距过小会增强缝间干扰,抑制裂缝扩展;排量提升可增强缝内净压力,促进裂缝长、宽、高同步发育;压裂液规模增加优先驱动缝长扩展;平均砂比控制在16%~24%可避免近井砂堵并保障支撑剂远场铺置效果;确定最优压裂参数为:段长60 m,射孔3簇、簇间距20 m,排量20 m3/min,平均砂比16%,最高砂比不超过24%,压裂液规模3 500 m3。(4) 该技术现场应用效果良好,现场微震监测结果显示缝网半长212.5~225.5 m,平均219.0 m,缝网高度25~40 m,平均32.5 m,缝网贯穿煤层并在底板中有所延伸,裂缝延伸特征与理论研究一致,且缝网扩展规模较同矿区常规顶板水平井分段压裂显著提升,可为同类碎软煤层气储层高效压裂改造提供技术支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective and Method To achieve rapid coalbed methane (CBM) extraction from broken-soft coal seams using surface horizontal wells, this study proposed a volume fracturing technology for coal seam roof using horizontal wells. Focusing coal seam 4-1 in a mining area, this study established a numerical model using finite element analysis (FEA) software Abaqus Using this model, the impacts of in-situ stress on the cross-layer propagation characteristics of multiple fractures were investigated. Through true triaxial hydraulic fracturing experiments, the multi-fracture propagation patterns under varying injection rates of fracturing fluids, perforation cluster numbers, and cluster spacings were analyzed. Using 3D fracturing design software Mshale, key parameters for volume fracturing, including perforation cluster number, cluster spacing, injection rate of fracturing fluids, average proppant ratio, and fracturing fluid volume, were optimized. Finally, the proposed technology with optimal parameters was applied to practical engineering.
    Results and Conclusions The in-situ stress state determined the morphology of fracture networks induced by volume fracturing. Specifically, when the vertical stress difference coefficient (k) ≤ 0, multiple fractures were prone to propagate along the direction of the minimum horizontal principal stress, ultimately forming horizontal fractures. In contrast, in the case of k ≥ 0.25, multiple fractures propagated rapidly across layers to form vertical fractures, with the cross-layer velocity increasing with k. Increasing interlayer stress difference increased the fracture length within the coal seam but decreased the fracture length within the coal seam roof. Meanwhile, the length difference between the middle fracture and fractures besides, as well as the average pressure for initial cracking, increased with the interlayer stress difference. Fractures in specimens preferentially propagated within the coal seam roof after initial cracking, with propagation patterns varying with the injection rate of fracturing fluids. A low injection rate caused insufficient fracture heights in the coal seam; a medium injection rate promoted fracture propagation in the coal seam, leading to the formation of interconnected fracture networks; a high injection rate, despite enabling fractures to extend to the specimen boundaries, increased the initial cracking. Regarding the impacts of perforation cluster number, two clusters generated I-shaped fractures, leading to uneven reservoir stimulation, while three clusters enabled fractures to interconnect within the coal seam, resulting in the formation of V-shaped fracture networks. In contrast, four clusters induced intense inter-fracture interference, leading to the formation of “凵”-shaped fracture networks within the roof. In this case, horizontal fractures prevented vertical fractures from propagating across different layers. Under excessively large cluster spacing, perforation clusters near the wellhead induced initial cracking first, leading to the formation of dominant channels. In contrast, it proved difficult for the remaining clusters to cause initial cracking. Therefore, excessively large cluster spacing is unfavorable for the formation of fracture networks. Furthermore, an excessive number of perforation clusters or too small cluster spacing can intensify inter-fracture interference, thereby inhibiting fracture propagation. Increasing the injection rate of fracturing fluids can enhance the net pressure within fractures, thus promoting the synchronous development of fracture length, width, and height. In contrast, an increase in fracturing fluid volume preferentially improves fracture length. Controlling the average proppant ratio within a range of 16%‒24% can avoid near-wellbore sand plugging while also ensuring effective far-field proppant placement. Accordingly, the optimal fracturing parameters were determined, including a fracturing section length of 60 m, a perforation cluster number of 3, a cluster spacing of 20 m, an injection rate of fracturing fluids of 20 m³/min, an average proppant ratio of 16% (maximum proppant ratio ≤ 24%), and a fracturing fluid volume of 3 500 m³. The proposed technology performed well in the field application. The field microseismic monitoring results indicate that the resulting fracture networks exhibited fracture half-lengths ranging from 212.5 m to 225.5 m (average: 219.0 m) and fracture heights from 25 m to 40 m (average: 32.5 m). The fracture networks penetrated the coal seam and extended into the coal seam floor, with the fracture propagation characteristics consistent with the theoretical research results. Within the same mining area, the expansion scale of the fracture networks created using this technology was significantly larger than that produced by the conventional multistage fracturing of coal seam floor using horizontal wells. The results of this study will provide technical support for efficient hydraulic-fracturing stimulation of CBM reservoirs in broken soft coal seams.

     

/

返回文章
返回