Occurrence characteristics and resource potential evaluation of tar-rich coal for No.5-2coal seam in Shenfu Mining Area
-
摘要: 随着煤炭清洁高效利用的推广以及黄河流域中段高质量发展的需求,榆林地区煤炭产业转型升级势在必行,而富油煤开发正是转型发展的重要方向之一。基于大量钻孔数据,结合井下实地采样化验结果及区域地质资料,详细分析神府矿区5-2煤层的焦油产率特征和富油煤的赋存特征。采用层次分析法,将资源赋存、煤层赋存、开发技术和社会环境效益4个因素作为主要指标,并细分10个评价参数,建立富油煤资源潜力评价体系。结果表明:神府矿区5-2煤层焦油产率平均值为9.81%,富油煤整体上发育良好;富油煤赋存特征主要为焦油产率高、整体发育稳定、局部存在差异性、面积广、潜力巨大等;研究区富油煤资源开发潜力平均综合得分77.34分,属于资源富集有利区;划分出2个资源有利区,面积约为700 km2,煤层厚度均大于5 m,焦油产率大于9%,富油煤储量超过2 000 Mt,主要包括红柳林井田、柠条塔井田、张家峁井田、大柳塔井田、大海则井田、石窑店井田、青龙寺井田,为下一步富油煤勘探开发指明了方向。Abstract: With the promotion of clean and efficient utilization of coal and the demand for high-quality development in the middle section of the Yellow River, the transformation and upgrading of coal industry is imperative in Yulin, and the exploitation of tar-rich coal one of the important directions. By organizing and making use of mass drill data, and in combination with the minefield underground spot sampling and regional geology, tar-yield characteristics and tar-rich coal occurrence features of tar-rich coal in No.5-2 coal seam in Shenfu Mining Area are analyzed in detail. Based on analytic hierarchy process, this paper takes resource allocation, coal bed occurrence, development technology as well as social and environmental benefits as main indicators, subdivides 10 evaluation parameters, and establishes a tar-rich coal resource potential evaluation system. The results show that the average tar yield is 9.81%, and the tar-rich coal is generally well developed. The occurrence characteristics of tar-rich coal includes high tar yield, stable development, local variability, wide area and great potential. The average comprehensive score of the development potential is 77.34 in the research region, which is a resource-rich favorable area. Two fav-orable resource areas are divided, with an area of about 700 km2, the coal seam thickness more than 5 m, the tar yield greater than 9%, and the reserves greater than 2 000 Mt, including Hongliulin minefield, Ningtiaota minefield, Zhangjiamao minefield, Daliuta minefield, Dahaize minefield, Shiyaodian minefield, and Qinglongsi minefield, which presents directions for the future tar-rich coal exploration and development.
-
表 1 神府矿区各井田5-2煤层焦油产率情况
Table 1 The tar-yield proportion of 5-2 coal seam in Shenfu mining area
井田 焦油产率/% 样品数 最小值 最大值 平均值 郭家湾井田 5.75 12.50 9.24 66 石窑店井田 6.59 15.07 10.03 38 三道沟井田 4.81 11.13 8.74 24 沙沟岔井田 7.85 11.88 9.84 17 张家峁井田 4.62 11.94 9.80 58 青龙寺井田 7.80 12.50 10.50 22 红柳林井田 7.76 17.58 10.98 126 柠条塔井田 7.58 13.97 10.37 57 孙家岔井田 6.37 11.85 9.39 64 大柳塔井田 5.20 12.10 8.75 48 活鸡兔井田 6.26 10.76 8.72 16 表 2 富油煤发育稳定性分析
Table 2 Stability analysis for tar-rich coal of 5-2 coal seam
富油煤高值点 焦油产率平均值/% 标准差 变异系数/% 稳定性 红柳林井田 10.98 1.34 11.28 良 石窑店井田 10.03 1.52 11.78 良 柠条塔井田 10.37 1.64 10.90 良 三道沟井田 8.74 1.97 12.80 中 郭家湾井田 9.24 1.98 12.30 中 青龙寺井田 10.5 1.88 11.75 良 表 3 富油煤资源潜力指标等级划分
Table 3 Tar-rich coal resource potential index classification
指标 指标占比/% 参数 等级划分:分数 Ⅰ:80~100 Ⅱ:60~80 Ⅲ:40~60 资源赋存 40 焦油产率/% >10 7~10 <7 煤层厚度/m >5 3~5 <3 资源量/Mt >1 000 500~1 000 <500 煤层赋存 20 煤层发育变异系数/% <20 20~35 >35 顶底板岩性 砂岩 砂质泥岩/泥质砂岩 泥岩 顶底板稳定程度 稳定 较稳定 不稳定 开发技术 20 技术优势 较大 一般 较小 大型企业数量 >2 1~2 <1 社会环境效益 20 资源转型发展 大 一般 小 水土保持 大 一般 小 表 4 富油煤资源潜力评价结果
Table 4 Results table of resource potential
井田 资源赋存 煤层赋存 开发技术 社会环境效益 评价结果 红柳林 36.00 15.00 18.00 16.50 85.50 柠条塔 35.33 14.67 18.00 16.00 84.00 大柳塔 34.67 16.33 18.00 16.00 85.00 张家峁 34.67 16.67 18.00 16.00 85.33 大海则 31.33 13.67 15.00 15.50 75.50 石圪台 28.67 13.67 16.00 15.50 73.83 石窑店 30.67 16.33 17.00 16.50 80.50 沙沟岔 28.00 15.67 15.00 15.00 73.67 青龙寺 28.00 15.67 16.00 15.50 75.17 榆家梁 28.67 16.33 16.00 15.50 76.50 活鸡兔 26.00 15.00 17.00 16.00 74.00 三道沟 28.00 14.00 16.00 15.00 73.00 朱盖塔 28.67 15.00 15.00 15.50 74.17 郭家湾 26.00 14.33 17.00 15.00 72.33 孙家岔 26.67 15.00 15.00 15.00 71.67 -
[1] 矿产资源工业要求手册编委会. 矿产资源工业要求手册(2014修订版)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014.Committee for the Preparation of a Handbook on Industrial Requirements for Mineral Resources. Handbook of industrial requirements for mineral resources(2014)[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 2014. [2] 高晋生. 煤热解、炼焦和煤焦油加工[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2010.GAO Jinsheng. Coal pyrolysis, coking and coal tar processing[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010. [3] 张飏, 孙会青, 白效言, 等. 低温煤焦油的基本特征及综合利用[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2009, 15(6): 57-60.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6772.2009.06.018ZHANG Yang, SUN Huiqing, BAI Xiaoyan, et al. The basic property and comprehensive utilization of low temperature coal-tar[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2009, 15(6): 57-60.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6772.2009.06.018 [4] 李增学, 魏久传, 刘莹. 煤地质学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005.LI Zengxue, WEI Jiuchuan, LIU Ying. Coal geology[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 2005. [5] 侯慧敏, 胡社荣, 潘响亮, 等. 腐植煤生油显微组分研究现状与进展[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 1997, 9(2): 24-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT702.005.htmHOU Huimin, HU Sherong, PAN Xiangliang, et al. Research status and progress of oil-generating macerals in humic coal[J]. Coal Geology of China, 1997, 9(2): 24-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT702.005.htm [6] 樊义龙, 王宁波, 徐红东, 等. 低温煤焦油产率和性质影响因素的研究[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2010, 16(6): 36-39.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6772.2010.06.010FAN Yilong, WANG Ningbo, XU Hongdong, et al. Analysis influencing factors of yield and properties of low-temperature tar[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2010, 16(6): 36-39.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6772.2010.06.010 [7] 司胜利, 李小彦, 田新娟, 等. 我国西部低煤级煤的液化性能[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2009, 37(3): 10-18.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2009.03.003SI Shengli, LI Xiaoyan, TIAN Xinjuan, et al. Liquefaction property of low rank coal in west China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2009, 37(3): 10-18.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2009.03.003 [8] 苗青, 郑化安, 张生军, 等. 低温煤热解焦油产率和品质影响因素研究[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2014, 20(4): 77-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJMS201404023.htmMIAO Qing, ZHENG Hua'an, ZHANG Shengjun, et al. Influencing factors of coal tar yield and quality from low-temperature coal pyrolysis[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2014, 20(4): 77-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJMS201404023.htm [9] 陈兆辉, 高士秋, 许光文. 煤热解过程分析与工艺调控方法[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3693-3707. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGSZ201710006.htmCHEN Zhaohui, GAO Shiqiu, XU Guangwen. Analysis and control methods of coal pyrolysis process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3693-3707. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGSZ201710006.htm [10] 杜芳鹏, 李聪聪, 乔军伟, 等. 陕北府谷矿区煤炭资源清洁利用潜势及方式探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(3): 11-14.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.03.003DU Fangpeng, LI Congcong, QIAO Junwei, et al. Discussion on the potential and way of clean utilization of coal resources in Fugu Mining Area, northern Shaanxi[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2018, 46(3): 11-14.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.03.003 [11] 魏云迅. 神府矿区郭家湾勘查区煤质特征及液化性能[J]. 煤质技术, 2017, 32(3): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MZYK201703004.htmWEI Yunxun. Coal quality characteristics and liquefaction properties of Guojiawan exploration area in Shenfu Mining Area[J]. Coal Quality Technology, 2017, 32(3): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MZYK201703004.htm [12] 王双明, 段中会, 马丽, 等. 西部煤炭绿色开发地质保障技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(2): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201902001.htmWANG Shuangming, DUAN Zhonghui, MA Li, et al. Research status and future trends of geological assurance technology for coal green development in western China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(2): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201902001.htm [13] 王双明. 鄂尔多斯盆地聚煤规律与煤炭资源评价[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1996.WANG Shuangming. Coal accumulating and coal resource evaluation of Ordos Basin[M]. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House, 1996. [14] 汤达祯. 煤变质演化与煤成气生成条件[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1998.TANG Dazhen. Coal metamorphism and the condition for coalbed gas[M]. Beijing: Geology Press, 1998. [15] TISSOT B P, WELTE D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984. [16] 李智学, 任海香, 贺丹, 等. 陕西省煤炭资源潜力评价报告[R]. 陕西省自然资源厅, 2010.LI Zhixue, REN Haixiang, HE Dan, et al. Evaluation report of coal resource potential in Shaanxi Province[R]. Department of Natural Resources of Shaanxi Province, 2010. [17] 魏云迅, 李聪聪, 乔军伟, 等. 神府矿区洁净煤划分及绿色开发建议[J]. 中国煤炭, 2019, 45(11): 79-83.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-530X.2019.11.018WEI Yunxun, LI Congcong, QIAO Junwei, et al. Clean coal grading and green development proposal of Shenfu Mining Area[J]. China Coal, 2019, 45(11): 79-83.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-530X.2019.11.018 [18] 孙晔伟, 唐跃刚, 李正越, 等. 中国特高挥发分特高油产率煤的分布及其特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017, 45(5): 6-12.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.05.002SUN Yewei, TANG Yuegang, LI Zhengyue, et al. Occurrence of super high volatile and tar yield coal in China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2017, 45(5): 6-12.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.05.002 [19] 张莉, 宁树正, 张建强, 等. 中国高焦油产率煤炭资源概况[C]//第二届全国煤及其共伴生矿产资源青年地质论坛论文集. 太原: 中国地质学会, 2020: 213-220.ZHANG Li, NING Shuzheng, ZHANG Jianqiang, et al. The oil-rich coal in China[C]//Anthology of the Second National Youth Geological Forum on coal and its associated mineral resources. Taiyuan: Geological Society of China, 2020: 213-220. [20] 秦云虎, 朱士飞. 云南省新近纪液化用褐煤分级指标及资源评价[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2012, 24(9): 12-15.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2012.09.03QIN Yunhu, ZHU Shifei. Yunnan Province Neogene lignite for liquefaction classification indices and resource evaluation[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2012, 24(9): 12-15.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2012.09.03 [21] 杜建磊, 申宇鹏, 李杨, 等. 集成AHP/嫡权法的煤炭资源开发利用综合评价: 以潞宁煤业公司为例[J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(4): 32-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA202004007.htmDU Jianlei, SHEN Yupeng, LI Yang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of coal resource development and utilization based onintegrated AHP/entropy weight method: Taking Luning Coal Industry Group as an example[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(4): 32-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA202004007.htm [22] 薛黎明, 崔超群, 郑欣, 等. 基于改进的AHP与模糊理论的县域矿产资源综合评价组合评价模型应用[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(2): 58-65.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2017.02.011XUE Liming, CUI Chaoqun, ZHENG Xin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation model of county mineral resources based on combined improved analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy theory[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2017, 26(2): 58-65.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2017.02.011 [23] 乔军伟, 范琪, 宁树正. 青藏高原煤炭资源潜力综合评价研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2019, 31(3): 1-5.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2019.03.01QIAO Junwei, FAN Qi, NING Shuzheng. Study on coal resource potential comprehensive assessment in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2019, 31(3): 1-5.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2019.03.01