深部储层煤层气产出影响因素

A Study on the Factors Influencing the Production of Deep Coalbed Methane

  • 摘要:目的】深部煤层气产出与浅部存在较大差异,维持储层渗透性或尽可能减小渗透率损失、提高煤层气(CH4)解吸效率及准确预测扩散规律是深部煤层气产出面临的重要挑战,亟需通过技术创新和理论研究攻关突破。【方法】对国内外煤储层渗透性、煤层气解吸、扩散等基础研究进展进行系统分析,结合深部煤储层排采阶段划分和不同阶段煤层气运移主要形式,总结深部煤层气产出机制及其影响因素。【结果和结论】结果表明:(1)深部煤层气产出划分为快速上产、相对稳产、缓慢递减和低产4个阶段。(2)快速上产和相对稳产阶段,储层压力高,气源以游离气为主,甲烷运移以渗流为主导,其主要影响因素包括煤体结构、孔裂隙发育程度、储层温度、原位地应力、有效应力等。该阶段应尽可能地减少渗透率损失,避免直接压开碎粒煤、糜棱煤占比较大的储层;相对稳产阶段之后储层温度的增渗作用会随着滑脱效应的增强逐渐增大;控压降、慢排采有助于减缓储层渗透率衰减。尽管在低产气阶段原生裂隙及人工裂隙渗透率损失率均接近100%,但不可逆渗透率损失率却远远低于浅部煤储层,昭示着储层二次改造增产的可行性。(3)快速上产至相对稳产阶段,吸附气开始缓慢解吸,扩大解吸范围、保证渗流通道,提高煤层气井产量是重中之重。深部煤储层中吸附气解吸较浅部所需时间长,临界解吸压力难以准确判断,解吸气体运移通道易压缩闭合,解吸范围受限。实验研究时应选用逐级降压解吸方式,可精准预估煤层气开采率;排采过程控制储层压力缓慢降低,可有效提升微孔中吸附气的解吸率。(4)低产气阶段,产气以远井区域解吸气供给为主,甲烷扩散决定煤层气井产量,扩散系数的准确测试和动态模型构建是关键。扩散系数各向异性特征显著,目前CH4扩散模型对煤体结构的各向异性特征很少涉及;构建CH4时变扩散模型,需考虑煤体多尺度孔隙-显微裂隙中扩散模式;结合煤中多尺度孔裂隙精细表征实验与高温高压核磁成像分析技术,可表征不同孔径间CH4密度变化。本次系统的总结和认识,将理论与生产实践相结合,进一步完善深部煤层气开发理论基础。

     

    Abstract: Objective The production of deep coalbed methane (CBM) differs significantly from that of shallow CBM. Maintaining reservoir permeability or minimizing permeability loss, enhancing the desorption efficiency of CBM (CH4), and accurately predicting the diffusion patterns are major challenges faced in the production of deep CBM. These issues urgently require breakthroughs through technological innovation and theoretical research. Methods Systematically analyze and summarize the progress in fundamental research on coal reservoir permeability, desorption, and diffusion around the world. Results and Conclusions Taking into account the characteristics of deep coal reservoirs and the various forms of coalbed gas migration during different production stages, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) the production of deep CBM can be divided into four stages: rapid production increase, relatively stable production, slow decline in production, and low-production stage. (2) During the rapid production increase and relatively stable production stages, the reservoir pressure is high, and the gas source is primarily free gas. Methane migration is dominated by seepage, with key influencing factors including coal structure, the development of pores and fractures, reservoir temperature, in-situ stress, and effective stress. During this period, it is essential to minimize the loss of permeability as much as possible, and avoid directly fracturing reservoirs with a high proportion of ruptured coal and mylonite coal. After the relatively stable production phase, the permeability increase due to reservoir temperature will gradually increase with the enhancement of the slip effect. Controlling pressure drop and slow production can help to slow down the decline of reservoir permeability. Although in the low-production stage, the permeability loss in primary and artificial fractures approaches 100%, the irreversible permeability loss is much lower than that in shallow coal reservoirs, indicating the feasibility of reservoir secondary enhancement for increased production. (3) As production increases rapidly and reaches a relatively stable stage, the adsorbed gas begins to desorb gradually. Expanding the desorption range, ensuring the continuity of seepage channels, and enhancing CBM well productivity become the primary objectives. Desorption in deep coal reservoirs takes significantly longer than in shallow ones, and the critical desorption pressure is difficult to determine accurately. The transport channels are prone to compression and closure, limiting the desorption range. Experimental studies should adopt a stepwise depressurization desorption method to precisely predict the methane recovery rate. In production engineering, controlling the reservoir pressure to decrease slowly can effectively enhance the desorption rate of adsorbed gas in micropores. (4) During the low-production stage, methane supply is mainly provided by desorbed gas from far-well area, and methane diffusion dictates the CBM well output. Accurate measurement of diffusion coefficients and construction of dynamic models are key factors. The anisotropic characteristics of the diffusion coefficient are significant, and current CH4 diffusion models rarely consider the anisotropic characteristics of coal structure. A time-varying diffusion model for CH4 should be developed, taking into account the diffusion patterns in coal's multi-scale pore and micro-fracture systems. Combined with fine-scale characterization experiments of coal's multi-scale pores and fractures and high-temperature, high-pressure nuclear magnetic resonance imaging analysis, the density changes of CH4 between different pore sizes can be represented. This systematic summary and understanding combine theory with production practice, further improving the theoretical foundation for deep CBM development.

     

/

返回文章
返回