Experimental study on heat transfer performance of double U-shaped buried tube heat exchanger
-
摘要: 双U型地埋管换热器(DUBTHE)在实际应用中易出现管路交叉,引起热短路,造成换热性能降低,直接影响浅层地源热泵系统的运行效率。以西安某浅层地源热泵项目为工程背景,基于无限长线热源理论和斜率法,通过现场岩土热响应试验、不同测温法测温试验,研究了岩土初始平均温度、导热系数和体积热容,及管卡间距对DUBTHE换热性能的影响。结果表明:多点式测温线缆测得的岩土初始平均温度为17.08℃,更接近实际地层温度。该地层的岩土综合导热系数和综合体积热容分别为1.65 W/(m·K)、2.81×106 J/(m3·K)。DN25 DUBTHE的夏、冬季单位延米换热量随着管卡间距减小而增加,且增速随管卡间距的减小先增大后减小。当管卡间距分别为1、2、3、4 m时,DN25 DUBTHE的夏季单位延米换热量较无管卡分别提高了21.03%、19.48%、15.16%、3.92%;DN25 DUBTHE的冬季单位延米换热量较无管卡分别提高了20.83%、19.48%、14.94%、3.79%。工程中最优的管卡布置方式为2 m或3 m管卡间距的DN25 DUBTHE。研究结果可为关中地区浅层地源热泵系统的优化设计提供经验借鉴与数据支撑。Abstract: Double U-shaped buried tube heat exchanger (DUBTHE) are prone to pipe crossing and thermal short-circuiting in the practical applications, resulting in the reduced heat transfer performance and directly affecting the operational efficiency of shallow geothermal heat pump system. Based on the initial line thermal average temperature, thermal conductivity theory and slope method, and taking a shallow geothermal heat pump project in Xi'an as the engineering background. Then, this study investigate the effects of initial average temperature, thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of rock-soil, and tube clamp spacing on the heat transfer performance of DUBTHE through field geotechnical thermal response testing and different temperature measurement methods. The results show that the initial average temperature of rock-soil measured by the multi-point temperature measurement cable is 17.08℃, which is closer to the actual formation temperature. Besides, the comprehensive thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of rock-soil in the formation are 1.65 W/(m·K) and 2.81×106 J/(m3·K), respectively. In addition, the heat exchange per linear meter of DN25 DUBTHE in summer and winter increases with the decreasing tube clamp spacing, with the acceleration increasing firstly and then decreasing with the decreasing tube clamp spacing. Definitely, the heat exchange per linear meter of DN25 DUBTHE in summer is increased by 21.03%, 19.48%, 15.16% and 3.92% respectively compared with that without tube clamp, and that in winter is increased by 20.83%, 19.48%, 14.94% and 3.79%, respectively, in case that the tube clamp spacing is 1 2, 3, and 4 m. DN25 DUBTHE with a tube clamp spacing of 2 m or 3 m is the optimal arrangement in the project. Therefore, the results could provide experience and data support for the optimal design of shallow ground source heat pump systems in Guanzhong area.
-
表 1 场地地层野外特征
Table 1 Field characteristics of site strata
地层编号 岩性 岩性描述 底层深度/m 层厚/m 1 黄土 黄褐色,硬,土质均匀,具虫孔,针孔状构造,含蜗牛壳,有光泽 5.5 5.5 2 粉质黏土 黄褐色,黏性较强,含氧化铁及钙质结核,夹薄层中砂 52.7 47.2 3 中砂 灰色,密实,以石英、长石为主,级配良好,含圆砾 59.3 6.6 4 粉质黏土 灰色,黏性较强,含氧化铁及钙质结核,夹薄层中砂 103.3 44.0 5 中砂 灰色,密实,含石英、长石及圆砾,夹薄层粉质黏土 112.5 9.2 6 粉质黏土 灰色,黏性较强,含氧化铁,局部含个别结核 120.8 8.3 7 中砂 灰色,密实,以石英、长石为主,级配良好,局部含圆砾 130.4 9.6 8 粉质黏土 灰色,黏性较强,含氧化铁,局部含个别结核 152.0 21.6 表 2 试验孔基本参数
Table 2 Basic parameters of test holes
试验孔
编号管卡间距
D1/m管材及地埋管
类型有效埋管
深度/m回填材料 SY1 无管卡 HDPE,
DN25
双U型,
并联连接152 河沙+原浆 SY2 1 SY3 2 SY4 3 SY5 4 原浆 表 3 试验孔参数设置
Table 3 Parameters setting of test holes
试验孔
编号管卡间距
D1/m设计间距
L/m制冷工况传热介质
平均温度ts/℃供热工况传热介质
平均温度tw/℃制冷季运行
份额Fw/%制冷季运行
时间份额Fw1/%供热季运行
份额Fs/%供热季运行
时间份额Fs2/%短期运行
时间/hSY1 0 5 32.5 7.5 23.81 33.43 21.84 33.15 8 SY2 1 SY3 2 SY4 3 SY5 4 表 4 试验孔测试数据
Table 4 Testing data of test holes
试验孔
编号循环流量V/(m3·h−1) 进水平均温度tin/℃ 出水平均温度tout/℃ 加热功率P/W SY1 1.41 34.78 29.84 7789 SY2 1.41 33.08 28.16 7875 SY3 1.43 32.85 27.98 7892 SY4 1.42 33.60 28.58 7867 SY5 1.42 34.14 29.11 7989 表 5 岩土综合热物性参数
Table 5 Parameter of comprehensive thermal properties of rock-soil
试验孔
编号拟合关系式 综合导热
系数/(W·m−1·K−1)综合体积
热容/( J·m−3·K−1)SY1 y=2.24217x+15.51482 1.82 1.98×106 SY2 y=2.52944x+11.82821 1.63 2.79×106 SY3 y=2.75851x+9.92116 1.50 3.91×106 SY4 y=2.45785x+12.82124 1.68 2.84×106 SY5 y=2.54067x+12.74308 1.65 2.80×106 表 6 试验孔单位延米换热量
Table 6 Heat exchange per linear meter of test holes
试验孔编号 夏季单位延米换
热量QS/( W·m−1)冬季单位延米换
热量Qw/( W·m−1)SY1 46.45 29.57 SY2 56.22 35.73 SY3 55.50 35.33 SY4 53.49 33.99 SY5 48.27 30.69 -
[1] SHAH A,KRARTI M,HUANG J. Energy performance evaluation of shallow ground source heat pumps for residential buildings[J]. Energies,2022,15(3):1025.. doi: 10.3390/en15031025 [2] LI Zhongjian,ZHENG Maoyu. Development of a numerical model for the simulation of vertical U−tube ground heat exchangers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2009,29:920−924.. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.04.024 [3] BEIER R A. Transient heat transfer in a U−tube borehole heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2014,62:256−266.. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.09.014 [4] KERME E D,FUNG A S. Comprehensive simulation based thermal performance comparison between single and double U–tube borehole heat exchanger and sensitivity analysis[J]. Energy & Buildings,2021,241:110876. [5] 杨卫波. 土壤源热泵技术及应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015. [6] 杨培志,陈嘉鹏,陈君文,等. 双U型地埋管换热器换热性能模拟分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,52(6):1733−1738.YANG Peizhi,CHEN Jiapeng,CHEN Junwen,et al. Simulation and analysis of heat transfer performance of double U−tube ground heat exchangers[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2021,52(6):1733−1738. [7] 邓军涛,张继文,郑建国,等. 不同形式和管径的地埋管换热器换热性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报,2015,36(11):2590−2596.DENG Juntao,ZHANG Jiwen,ZHENG Jianguo,et al. Analysis on thermal performance of different type and diameter ground heat exchanger[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2015,36(11):2590−2596. [8] 邓军涛,王娟娟,郑建国. 不同管径和埋深地埋管换热器换热性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报,2021,42(9):416−421.. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2019-0890DENG Juntao,WANG Juanjuan,ZHENG Jianguo. Analysis on thermal performance of ground heat exchanger with various diameters and depths[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2021,42(9):416−421.. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2019-0890 [9] FLORIDES G A,CHRISTODOULIDES P,POULOUPATIS P. Single and double U−tube ground heat exchangers in multiple−layer substrates[J]. Applied Energy,2013,102:364−373.. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.035 [10] 沈国民,张虹. 竖直U型埋管地热换热器热短路现象的影响参数分析[J]. 太阳能学报,2007,28(6):604−607.. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-0096.2007.06.007SHEN Guomin,ZHANG Hong. Parametric analysis of thermal interference in vertical U−tube heat exchangers for GCHP[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2007,28(6):604−607.. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-0096.2007.06.007 [11] PU Liang,XU Lingling,QI Di,et al. Structure optimization for horizontal ground heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2018,136:131−140.. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.101 [12] PU Liang,XU Lingling,QI Di,et al. A novel tree–shaped ground heat exchanger for GSHPs in severely cold regions[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2019,146:278−287.. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.111 [13] JAHANBIN A. Thermal performance of the vertical ground heat exchanger with a novel elliptical single U–tube[J]. Geothermics,2020,86:101804.. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101804 [14] LI Xinguo,CHEN Yan,CHEN Zhihao,et al. Thermal performances of different types of underground heat exchangers[J]. Energy and Buildings,2006,38(5):543−547.. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.09.002 [15] 穆玄,裴鹏,周鑫,等. 岩溶构造对地埋管群换热效率影响数值模拟研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(10):131−139.. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.09.0513MU Xuan,PEI Peng,ZHOU Xin,et al. Numerical simulation of the influence of karst structure on heat transfer efficiency of buried pipeline group[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(10):131−139.. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.09.0513 [16] 李娟,郑佳,雷晓东,等. 地质条件及埋管形式对地埋管换热器换热性能影响研究[J]. 地球学报,2023,44(1):221−229.. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2022.092602LI Juan,ZHENG Jia,LEI Xiaodong,et al. Study on the influence of geological conditions and heat exchanger type on BHE thermal performance[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2023,44(1):221−229.. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2022.092602 [17] SCHIBUOLA L,SCARPA M. Ground source heat pumps in high humidity soils:An experimental analysis[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2016,99:80−91.. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.040 [18] LI Wenxin,LI Xiangdong,PENG Yuanling,et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the thermal performance of ground heat exchangers in a layered subsurface with groundwater[J]. Renewable Energy,2020,147:620−629.. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.008 [19] 朱红梅. 基于双U型地埋管的岩土热响应试验数据处理分析研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2014.ZHU Hongmei. Study on the insitu soil thermal response test data processing methods of double U–tube BHE[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2014. [20] GEHLIN S. Thermal response test: Method development and evaluation[D]. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology, 2002. [21] YOON S,KIM M J. Prediction of ground thermal diffusivity from thermal response tests[J]. Energy and Buildings,2019,185:239−246.. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.027 [22] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air–conditioning Engineers. 2007 ASHRAE Handbook–HVAC applications (SI)[M]. New York: Stephen Comstock, 2007. [23] SPITLER J D,GEHLIN S E A. Thermal response testing for ground source heat pump systems:An historical review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015,50:1125−1137.. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.061