李恒乐, 曹运兴, 周丹, 柴学周, 刘同吉, 冯培文, 石玢, 田林. 煤层气直井氮气泡沫压裂参数分析及产能评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(3): 65-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.010
引用本文: 李恒乐, 曹运兴, 周丹, 柴学周, 刘同吉, 冯培文, 石玢, 田林. 煤层气直井氮气泡沫压裂参数分析及产能评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(3): 65-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.010
LI Hengle, CAO Yunxing, ZHOU Dan, CHAI Xuezhou, LIU Tongji, FENG Peiwen, SHI Bin, TIAN Lin. Fracturing parameters analysis and productivity evaluation of vertical coalbed methane wells with nitrogen foam[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(3): 65-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.010
Citation: LI Hengle, CAO Yunxing, ZHOU Dan, CHAI Xuezhou, LIU Tongji, FENG Peiwen, SHI Bin, TIAN Lin. Fracturing parameters analysis and productivity evaluation of vertical coalbed methane wells with nitrogen foam[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(3): 65-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.010

煤层气直井氮气泡沫压裂参数分析及产能评价

Fracturing parameters analysis and productivity evaluation of vertical coalbed methane wells with nitrogen foam

  • 摘要: 压裂参数是决定压裂效果、影响裂缝特征与煤层气产能的重要参数,深入认识压裂参数对产能的影响规律,对于优化压裂工艺和提高煤层气井产能至关重要。以潞安矿区45口氮气泡沫压裂井为对象,分析压裂施工曲线的类型及其对产能的影响,探讨各阶段压裂液用量与产能之间的关系,并对比评价氮气泡沫与水力压裂井产能的差异性。结果表明:氮气泡沫压裂施工曲线可分为稳定型、波动型、上升型和下降型4类9型,下降型和稳定型压裂曲线对应的产能要高于波动型,上升型曲线对应的产能最差;总压裂液用量以800 m3为宜,前置液和顶替液用量分别为450 m3和8 m3,氮气注入量在5万m3左右最佳,而携砂液用量越大产能越高,氮气泡沫压裂液良好的携砂、造缝、沉降支撑性能是有助于提高产能的优势所在;整体上,就潞安矿区而言,氮气泡沫压裂井的产能明显高于水力压裂井,主要体现在高产井、中高产井的比例远大于水力压裂井,约61%的氮气泡沫压裂井具有较高产能,而水力压裂井为23%。氮气泡沫压裂技术在潞安矿区展示出的可观潜力,可为国内其他具有类似储层特征矿区的煤层气开发提供技术借鉴。

     

    Abstract: Fracturing parameters are important parameters that affect the fracturing effect, fracture characteristics and CBM productivity. Through an in-depth understanding of the influence of fracturing parameters on productivity, it is essential to optimize the fracturing process and increase the productivity of CBM wells. Taking 45 nitrogen foam fracturing wells in Lu’an mining area as the research object, the types of fracturing operation curves and their effects on productivity were studied. The relationship between fracturing fluid dosage and productivity was discussed. The differences in productivity of nitrogen foam wells and hydraulic fracturing wells was compared and analyzed. The results show that: Nitrogen foam fracturing operation curve can be divided into four categories: stable, fluctuating, ascending and descending. The production capacity of the descending and stable fracturing curves is higher than that of the fluctuating type, the ascending curve corresponds to the worst productivity; Statistical data show that 800 m3 is suitable for total liquid volume, 450 m3 for ahead fluid and 8 m3 for displacement liquid, and about 50 000 m3 for nitrogen injection. But the higher the amount of sand-carrying liquid, the higher the productivity, which reflects that the good sand-carrying, seam-forming and sedimentation performance of nitrogen foam fracturing fluid is the key point to improve production capacity; As the whole nitrogen foam fracturing well production is significantly higher than the hydraulic fracturing of wells, the proportion of high-yield wells and medium-high-yield wells of the former is much larger than the later, 61% nitrogen foam fracturing wells had higher productivity while hydraulic fracturing wells with higher productivity was 23%. The considerable potential of nitrogen foam fracturing technology in Lu’an mining area can provide technical reference for coalbed methane development in other mining areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回