刘小平, 李姗, 刘新星, 曹晓毅, 王玉涛. 煤矿采空区注浆治理工后质量检测技术与实践[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(5): 113-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.014
引用本文: 刘小平, 李姗, 刘新星, 曹晓毅, 王玉涛. 煤矿采空区注浆治理工后质量检测技术与实践[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(5): 113-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.014
LIU Xiaoping, LI Shan, LIU Xinxing, CAO Xiaoyi, WANG Yutao. Method and practice of quality test after grouting in coal mine goaf[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(5): 113-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.014
Citation: LIU Xiaoping, LI Shan, LIU Xinxing, CAO Xiaoyi, WANG Yutao. Method and practice of quality test after grouting in coal mine goaf[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(5): 113-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.014

煤矿采空区注浆治理工后质量检测技术与实践

Method and practice of quality test after grouting in coal mine goaf

  • 摘要: 注浆质量检测是煤矿采空区废弃土地高效开发利用的关键技术,对科学评价采空区治理后场地稳定及建(构)筑物安全具有重要意义。通过众多工程实践,对注浆质量的检测方法、指标、合格标准、评价方法及检测工作中存在的误区进行了全面总结。结果表明,注浆工后质量检测是一项系统性工作,应根据建(构)筑物特点及注浆设计要求,遵循“内外兼顾、前后一致、综合检测”的原则优选检测方法;将检测指标分为直接指标(充填率、结石体强度)、间接指标(透水率、波速等物性参数)及结果指标(变形值)3大类,不宜将岩心采取率作为检测指标;检测指标及合格标准应充分考虑建(构)筑物地基设计要求及采空区埋深等工程特点综合确定;确定变形指标合格标准时,需统筹兼顾场地稳定指标及建(构)筑物允许变形值。提出了一种适宜于煤矿采空区注浆质量百分制评定法,将施工过程质量控制及工后质量检测成果紧密结合,定量评价整体注浆效果;将建筑物、地基、采空区三者视为一个系统,讨论了目前检测工作中存在的4大误区,对地下隐蔽灾害治理质量及效果评价具有重要的实践价值。

     

    Abstract: Grouting quality test is the key technology for efficient development and utilization of waste land in the goaf of a coal mine, it is of great significance to evaluate the stability of the site and the safety of construction after goaf management. Based on many engineering practices, this paper summarizes the evaluation method of the qualified standards of the grouting quality and the errors existed in the testing work. The results proved that the quality inspection after grouting is a systematic work. The test method could be optimized according to the characteristics of the construction and grouting design requirements, following the principles of considering both the internal and external work, and keeping the methods consistent and comprehensive detection. The detection indexes were divided into direct indexes(consolidation grouting rate and concrete strength), indirect indexes(permeability, wave velocity and other physical property parameters) and result indexes(deformation value), and core recovery should not be used as a testing indicator. The test indexes and the qualified standards should be determined comprehensively with full consideration of the design requirements of the foundation and the characteristics of the goaf buried depth. When determining the qualified standards of the deformation index, overall consideration should be given to the stability index of the site and the allowable deformation value of the structure. A method for evaluating the grouting quality of goaf was presented, which closely combined the construction process quality control, post-work quality inspection results and the quantitative evaluation of overall grouting effect level. The construction, foundation and goaf of coal mine was regarded as a system, four types of errors in the present detection work were discussed, it has important practical value to evaluate the quality and the effect of underground concealed disaster management.

     

/

返回文章
返回