深层煤层气勘探开发标准体系的战略布局与优化路径

The strategic layout and optimization path of the standard system for Deep coalbed methane and gas exploration and development

  • 摘要:
    目的 我国深层煤层气产业已成为天然气增储上产的关键领域,但现行技术标准体系基于浅层实践建立,与深层勘探开发需求存在系统性不适配,为解决这一问题,提出标准体系优化路径,为深层煤层气规模化开发提供标准化支撑。
    方法 基于深层煤层气高温、高压、高地应力的复杂地质特征及“吸附气与游离气并存、压后见气、高能高产”的赋采特点,系统剖析现行标准体系在地质勘探评价、技术经济需求、安全环保风险及产业协同管理四个维度面临的具体冲击,结合深层勘探开发难点与特殊性,构建优化路径。
    结果 研究表明深层煤层气标准体系建设需立足现有体系,聚焦地质评价、技术创新与风险管控三大核心瓶颈,攻关储层精细表征等关键标准;提出四大优化路径,即革新地质标准、创新技术经济标准、构建“预防−控制−修复”三位一体环保标准、推动跨领域标准协同。
    结论 研究提出的“四位一体”标准优化路径,可有效解决现行标准与深层煤层气勘探开发的适配难题,为我国深层煤层气产业安全、高效、规模化开发提供坚实的标准化支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The deep coalbed methane (CBM) industry in China has become a key sector for increasing natural gas reserves and production. However, the current technical standard system, established on the basis of shallow CBM practices, is systematically incompatible with the demands of deep CBM exploration and development. This paper aims to analyze the impacts of such incompatibility and propose an optimization path for the standard system, so as to provide standardization support for the large-scale development of deep CBM.
    Methods Based on the complex geological characteristics of deep CBM reservoirs featuring high temperature, high pressure and high in-situ stress, as well as their occurrence and production characteristics of "coexisting adsorbed gas and free gas, gas production after fracturing, high energy and high productivity", this paper systematically dissects the specific impacts of the current standard system in four dimensions: geological exploration and evaluation, techno-economic requirements, safety and environmental protection risks, and industrial collaborative management. An optimization path is constructed by combining the difficulties and particularities of deep CBM exploration and development.
    Results The research shows that the construction of a deep CBM standard system should be based on the existing system, focus on the three core bottlenecks of geological evaluation, technological innovation and risk control, and tackle key standards such as fine reservoir characterization. Four optimization paths are proposed: innovating geological standards, establishing techno-economic standards, building a trinity environmental protection standard system of "prevention-control-restoration", and promoting cross-field standard coordination.
    Conclusion The proposed "four-in-one" standard optimization path can effectively solve the incompatibility between current standards and deep CBM exploration and development, and provide solid standardization support for the safe, efficient and large-scale development of China's deep CBM industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回