CHEN Zhengrong,LIU Wei,ZHU Xueshen,et al. Prediction of geological and engineering integrated sweet spots of deep coalbed methane[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(6):191−200. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.11.0727
Citation: CHEN Zhengrong,LIU Wei,ZHU Xueshen,et al. Prediction of geological and engineering integrated sweet spots of deep coalbed methane[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2025,53(6):191−200. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.11.0727

Prediction of geological and engineering integrated sweet spots of deep coalbed methane

  • Objective Deep coalbed methane (CBM) has emerged as a hot topic in CBM resource development. However, deep CBM has characteristics such as great burial depths, complex stress environments, and strong reservoir heterogeneity, which seriously restrict sweet spot prediction and accurate well location deployment in its large-scale exploitation.
    Methods This study investigated a deep CBM field along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin. Using sonic, density, and caliper logging, this study developed a coal structure index model for deep coals. By introducing the coal structure index based on the coal structure differences in deep coal seams and combining factors including overburden formation pressure, tectonic stress, and pore pressure, this study established an adaptive horizontal in-situ stress difference model for deep coal seams. Based on the rock strength parameter, the enlargement rate of wellbore diameter, and the fracture toughness of rocks, a natural fissure index model was constructed. By integrating these three models, as well as the six indices of geological and engineering sweet spots, this study developed an intelligent prediction model of geological and engineering integrated sweet spots of deep CBM using support vector machine (SVM).
    Results The results indicate that the intelligent prediction model of geological and engineering integrated sweet spots yielded a prediction accuracy of 88.2%. Classes I, II, and III sweet spots were identified in the study area, with areas of 117.4 km2 (14.0%), 258.4 km2 (30.8%), and 463.1 km2 (55.2%), respectively, and average predicted production of 6478.6 m3/d, 5076.7 m3/d, and 4022 m3/d, respectively.
    Conclusions Based on the results of this study, it is recommended to focus on Class I sweet spots, actively explore Class II sweet spots, and proactively avoid Class III sweet spots in the well location deployment for deep CBM in the study area. The fine-scale prediction of geological and engineering integrated sweet spots can provide valuable guidance for reserve growth and production addition of deep CBM along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return